The Iroquois Declaration of War on Germany, 1942
In 1942, the Iroquois Six Nations declared war on the Axis
powers, asserting its right as an independent sovereign nation to
do so. This proclamation authoritatively allowed Iroquois men to
enlist and fight in World War II on the side of the Allied
powers.
The provocation for this declaration had historical antecedence.
The Iroquois declared war on the Axis powers in reaction to a
1941 circuit court of appeals decision entitled ex parte
Green, which upheld Washington's Nationality Act of 1940
specifying that the Iroquois Confederacy, among other American
Indian tribes, was subject to federal law despite the appearance
of national sovereignty bound by treaty. Historically, the
treaties that Washington had, and continues to have, with various
Indian tribes were all in perpetuity. These are contracts
relating to both services and ownership of land, as well as to
tribal and First Nations' rights. However, in the 1941 case, the
court felt differently. It ruled that the 1940 Nationality Act
unequivocally made Warren Eldreth Green, the Iroquois
contesting the Act, a citizen, even without his consent. The
court was modeling its decision on an earlier 1924 act of
Congress that made American Indians citizens. Thus all American
Indians fell under the same ruling. The Iroquois, of course, were
offended by the decision. They felt that as a foreign nation, the
tribal members of their Confederacy were not technically
citizens, and therefore not subject to the Selective Service Act
of 1940, which they believed was promulgated
unilaterally by Congress, and without their consent, thus
imposing federal supremacy over Indians and Indian
affairs[1].
In reaction to this decision, and in order to uphold its
sovereignty as a separate state, delegates from the Six Nations
Confederacy assembled in conference on 13 June 1942, to draft a
formal declaration of war. The following day, on the steps of the
United States Capitol, a spokesman of the Confederacy read the
following:
We represent the oldest, though smallest, democracy in the world
today. It is the unanimous sentiment among Indian people that the
atrocities of the Axis nations are violently repulsive to all
sense of righteousness of our people, and that this merciless
slaughter of mankind can no longer be tolerated. Now we do
resolve that it is the sentiment of this council that the Six
Nations of Indians declare that a state of war exists between our
Confederacy of Six Nations on the one part and Germany, Italy,
Japan and their allies against whom the United States has
declared war, on the other part.
Thus acting, from its own perspective, as an independent
sovereign state, the Iroquois nation entered World War II on its
own consent and terms[2].
The Confederacy's justification for entering war was as much for
honor as for principle and expediency. Apart from legal
obligations and possible threats of reprisal (if they did not
obey the court), the Iroquois wanted their nation to enter the
war with an appeal to integrity or moral soundness. Thus they
spoke of righteousness, or doing right, as if wanting to
make the struggle with merciless slaughter confined and
narrower until the source of that slaughter or carnage was
overcome.
Such a posture reminds one of the dilemma in which the Iroquois
Confederacy found itself at the time of the American Revolution.
The English wanted the Confederacy to commit their resources in
support of the British government. The Confederacy was divided,
even though it required a consensus to act, and certainly to
declare war. Nevertheless, the Mohawks and Senecas supported the
British, the Oneidas and Tuscaroras supported the Colonies, and
the Cayugas and Onondagas attempted to remain neutral. The
question arises: What was the guiding principle of each tribe of
the Confederacy for entering the war or staying neutral?[3] Historians give a number of
reasons, not the least being the Confederacy's political system
of requiring unanimity among all six tribes, which ultimately
proved unworkable by being incapable of reconciling the partisan
agendas of each tribe.
In 1779, General George Washington, suspecting a Confederacy
assault in the northeast, eventually sent General John Sullivan
to attack the villages of the Confederacy in western New York
state, devastating all Iroquois villages there and ultimately
destroying the power of the Confederacy. After the war, the two
tribes of the Confederacy that supported the Colonies, namely the
Tuscarora and the Oneida, were rewarded with privileges and given
large tracts of land. The remaining four tribes were forced to
cede their lands. Most went to Canada. Over time, during the
1800s, two independent Canadian and American Confederacies
emerged, but only as remnants of the once powerful original
Iroquois Confederacy[4].
No doubt by 1941, with the wisdom of hindsight, the Iroquois knew
more of their American neighbors than to expect bad things from
them, and were ready to call affiliated Americans their brothers
and sisters upon easier terms than in 1779, especially
considering the merciless slaughter of the Axis powers.
Possibly they also saw the U.S. Constitution as the best
embodiment of the sentiments of their people and their earlier
Confederacy.
[1]: World War II and the
American Indians by Kenneth William Townsend, The University
of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM, pp103-124 (©2000).
[return to text]
[2]: Ibid.
[return to text]
[3]: "Molly Brant: Her Domestic and
Political Roles in Eighteenth-Century New York" by Lois Feister
and Bonnie Pulis in Northeastern Indian Lives 1632-1816 ed
by Robert S. Grumet, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst,
pp295-320 (©1996).
[return to text]
[4]: Ibid.
[return to text]
[editorial note: Until 2004, AmerIndians
constituted the largest ethnic minority serving in the Armed
Forces, which arguably had more to do with their subculturally
based warrior ethos than with economics; but given the
historic relationship between AmerIndian tribes and the US
government, it's remarkable that Indians have willingly and
competently served a paternalistic nation that has been less than
accommodating. A significant result of this traditional
inculcation has been the spiritual healing of warriors, ancient
or modern, which surpasses the reintegration rate of the dominant
heterogeneous society, despite a crosscultural anomie prevalent
in the modern era. This adoptive absorption is most crucial when
the war is unpopular, as they mostly have been since
WWII, and thus bespeaks a finer sensibility than they have been
credited with by outsiders.]
by James Wm. Chichetto
... who is a freelance poet, with eight books of verse to his
credit, and works appearing in The Native American Poetry
Anthology, The First Abbey Wood Anthology, The
Boston Globe, The Boston Phoenix,
The Colorado Review, Gargoyle,
The Manhattan Review, Poem,
The Paterson Review, as well as previously in
this literary magazine. He is related to combat veterans of the
Korean War and World War Two; and teaches writing and literature
at Stonehill College.
|