A Modest Proposal
"The prospect of immanent danger has a marvelous way of focusing
the mind!"
anonymous
There's great childhood entertainment in playing an amusing game
of blind man's bluff, but as adults we soon learn that
some people play for keeps with real victims.
Vision is indisputably man's most important sense, and eye-contact has a bearing upon most interactions ... which is why
some criminals blindfold or mask their victims, thus accentuating
dependency, increasing anguish, and dehumanizing the act.
Statistics[1] show that the average
person has a low crime risk, and that dangers can often be either
avoided or prevented; but disabled persons, by virtue of their
obvious limitations and conspicuous presence, are very appealing
to some types of criminals.
With all the fanfare about civil liberties and the furor about
legal entitlements for the handicapped, there is still a need for
constitutional privacy, for protection against uncivil liberties.
Few disabled persons are stereotypical paradigms, and many of us
are frustrated by discriminatory disparities, but most of us
regard egalitarianism as an opportunity to adjust
qualitatively. In the simplest of terms, we seek the right not to
be typecast and the privilege to become private individuals. As a
combat-blinded veteran coping with everyday adjustments to ever
changing circumstances, this is an unabashedly modest
proposal for realistic self-defense that enhances self-esteem and personal autonomy.
In a very real manner, criminals violate the civil rights of
their victims ... by denying them peace, liberty, and security.
Elderly and disabled persons are prime candidates for
victimization because they are, generally, so utterly
defenseless. Criminal motivation is exceedingly complex, so a
barricaded life of fearful denial is no guaranty. Statistically,
most violent crimes involve a woman victimized by a known male
perpetrator. The inept criminal justice system, and its
arcane procedures, will not abet or ameliorate recovery. The
analogy of a modern society resembling a vicious jungle populated
by wild animals is far more credible than the ingenuously utopian
vision of advanced species inhabiting a civilized haven.
Given the anxieties of a highly technical, highly mobile, and
overly bureaucratic society, that is confused by contradictory
tension-release or stress-escape mechanisms, there is little
wonder at our common plight. The premise of my modest
proposal is that disabled persons are not
unable, but merely other-able. Furthermore,
law is not the sole vehicle of social
engineering, and is not the principal standard of ethics. I
therefore modestly propose that blind persons
assist themselves by acting in defense and protection of their
precious lives.
The greatest quibble against this modest
proposal will be that the feeble and infirm cannot be
classed with the super-blind. With notable exceptions, I
beg to differ. Having studied martial arts during and after
military service, I dispute this skepticism with the rationale
that man has always fought best with his brain, and that the
intelligent combatant is wary. Sometimes it takes only a small
demonstration to quickly educate an adversary. The best
advice for winning a confrontation is to avoid it! Unfortunately,
a disabled person is easily stalked by an able one; and refined
techniques may be overwhelmed by brute force. The fact of the
matter is that most blind people are elderly, are female, retain
some useful vision or perception, and also have other or
complicating physical problems. However, the blind population
also includes young athletes, including collegiate wrestlers, and
active adult professionals. An ancient Taoist parable recounts
the training of a gamecock, which consisted entirely of
developing its majestic comportment to the point that no opponent
would dare to approach it! Thus, the first lesson in
self-defense is self-control.
Too often the concept of self-control conjures a rigid,
aloof, unemotional, or sour person who's painfully awkward. The
discipline we want to cultivate is to direct
our energies, rather than suppress them. It's more than
maximizing our will power, since we want to
channel the course of our limited resources ... and rest
assured that everyone's resources are finite or restricted,
regardless of classification or category. This is the same kind
of mental preparation which enables us to overcome improbable
odds ... first in the mind, then in reality. Guarding this
internal resource is as important as not misusing it. Aikido
masters have demonstrated prodigious feats of strength, and Zen
masters have wrecked the scales purporting to measure brain
waves, but these are only examples of limited application. One's
primary weapon against foes should be a dignified
self-possession. If one pretends competence with
arrogant aggression, then the offensive broadcast will rebound,
to the detriment of the poseur. So one must cultivate a balanced
presence which projects neither hostility nor timidity.
The next lesson in self-defense involves the resolution
of attitude. Together with mental discipline, the
private resolution of sensitive attitudes, with social and
ethical implications, are fundamental to good character
development ... and critical to emotionally surviving assault. To
pursue further training, one must confront the possibilities, and
resolve all pertinent doubts before the
situation compels a decision. Since most blind people are female,
a generalization is in order ... although my observations extend
to many men as well. Women usually have less gross-strength than
men but more endurance; however, the essential difference between
the sexes is that women are both more reluctant to accept pain
and more hesitant to inflict pain; but are also better suited for
both. There is no dispute that tribal women around the world were
tougher than modern ladies, that certain cultures or
circumstances have produced lethal female warriors, and that a
few hard-case tattooed mamas in our own milieu can kick-ass with the best of 'em; but the generalization stands!
The problem is that offering no defense is probably
safer for the average person, being statistically less
injurious or traumatic, than attempting an inadequate partial
defense. Putting-up only half-resistance may make the
attacker angry enough to do some terrible damage. In other words,
just as in fighting on the battlefield, fair play and
time-out don't exist in the criminal arena ... although
rematch is a distinct possibility for a sadist. Remember
that social conventions do not apply in most conflicts, and
anyone sufficiently depraved to deliberately victimize an
obviously handicapped person won't respect any normative rules;
so while non-resistance may forestall conventional attacks, it
will probably exacerbate the ministrations of the weak or
perverted criminal. A potential victim must decide ahead of time
just how much limited risk and unlimited damage they will endure,
if any. Knowing that the name of the game is you bet
your life convinces me to play it totally and
completely, with winner take all. It is my considered belief that
someone is only as defenseless as one wants to be!
The next phase is physical training. If, after
due consideration, you are going to fight, then you must be
prepared to endure some level of punishment, and to exercise some
level of exertion. Blind rock-climbers tend to fall into two
basic categories: those who are petrified by their imaginations,
and those who are less fearful due to the absence of visual-input
... and so it is with fighters. A feint or diversion won't work
on a motivated blind boxer, but the mere thought of being
hammered, without the ability to protect oneself, will terrify
another. A regimen of physical training doesn't mean a fascist
boot camp nor a yuppie aerobics spa, but rather optimum
physical conditioning. Motility and agility are much more
important than hardened callouses and bulging muscles, than
retarded pulse and deprivation exhilaration. Likewise, pre-test
pummeling as an alleged preparation for uncontrolled violence is
simply a masochistic exercise ... only pugilists and infantrymen
are repeatedly subjected to such abuse. Good physical fitness
promotes self-confidence and encourages balanced temperament.
Excessive calisthenic training is tedious and inefficient, thus
counterproductive by abandonment. If physical training and
optimal preparation are mortifying, then one either needs further
rehabilitation for greater independence, or assignment to some
form of protective guardianship in a cloistered environment.
With the onset of a disability, one's character and personality
doesn't change, and instincts don't evaporate ... a blind man is
still a man. Exercise
and manual labor will help to dissipate some of the ordinary
tensions and tedium associated with impairments ... even nursing
homes have begun instituting dirt therapy in small
garden plots for their residents with impressive results in
diminished medication, increased alertness, and improved
attitude. Many agencies and offices are recognizing the medical
benefits and elevated morale when exercise time is scheduled into
the daily routine. During rehabilitation, when frustrations
threatened my equilibrium, I found weight-lifting and pounding a
punching-bag to be a socially acceptable manner of
expelling anger that would otherwise make me vulnerable. Not only
does physical conditioning make anyone better able to cope with
an unexpected circumstance, such as an accident or confrontation,
the practice makes reactions smoother and more exact.
The fourth lesson is usually where most combat
courses begin: techniques. There is a
deterrent value in offensive posturing, in
assuming the on guard posture at the instant of
initial threat. This response involves considerable training and
strict vigilance ... a procedure having reportedly saved at least
one blind person from a vicious mugging[2] ... and therefore is beyond our
modest and limited defensive concern. Suffice it to say that
combat isn't a game wherein one's opponent will tolerate
ineffective ploys; and weapons aren't toys that may be
indiscriminately waived at suspected or imaginary antagonists.
Getting people to pay attention and retain necessary skills,
without immediate danger or hysterical paranoia, is essential to
survival. Too many victims seek remedial training after the fact
... it's human nature, but still erroneous. Furthermore, far too
many people trust objects for their secure protection,
instead of managing their own skills, which can't be
mislaid or misused. There are few things as randomly and
universally dangerous as an untrained person with a deadly weapon
... then factor panic into the scenario for an instant
disaster! In other words, there is no quick and easy solution to
personal safety or self-defense.
The most important part of technique is tactics.
Remember, any doubts and questions were resolved at the earlier
attitudinal phase, so we are now dealing with
uncompromising problem solving methodologies. Because
man is an ostensibly rational animal, it's natural to
speculate about causes or reasons, but such knowledge is
immaterial, if not counterproductive, when resolving an urgent
threat ... and if there's time to negotiate conflict
resolution modalities, then the impending crisis isn't
urgent! The social genesis or criminal pathology of an assailant
is like the etiology of international relations during an
incursion ... perhaps quite interesting and informative, but
not germane to remedying the immediate incident.
The fact that some people victimize the weak to empower or
encourage themselves is not relevant to one's survival of an
exigency.
The basic tactical rules for combat are: decision, aggression,
and speed. One must rapidly assess the situation, determine one's
options, decide on a technique, and immediately dispatch that
decision. Part of serious in-depth training involves the
conscious recognition of altered conditions and various means of
modification or accommodation. When one has determined that a
violation, confrontation, or provocation exists, do
NOT brag or threaten, argue or debate,
complain or plead ... just execute an immediate and unhesitating
dynamic defense! Act, act thoroughly, but act rightly.
After one's adrenalin is pumping and action is initiated, try to
intimidate, confuse, disorient, or frighten the adversary. Avoid
being predictable ... try to surprise or startle him. Make alot
of noise, including ki shouts, when
counterattacking; because stealth and echo-location now have
reverse values. The rationale for this procedure is to benefit
the blind defender as much as possible. If the court later gets
involved, any preliminary aggressive act or talk can be
construed or misconstrued as sufficient warrant for the
attack; thus shifting some blame onto an innocent party. But more
practically, the assailant's location and movements, which sounds
are key indicators for blind defense, will be masked by premature
speech or movement. Once the battle is joined, excessive noise
(which, believe me, you will not hear anyway!) may alert
professionals or attract assistance.
A bad day can be depressing and distracting, but
inattention can invite a criminal to make it much worse. A fellow
veteran, confronted in a remote passageway, relieved his
frustration on two armed muggers who wouldn't believe that he had
a headache and wasn't in the mood to be messed with, putting them
both in the hospital, but he's the exception to the rule. Not
only can posture and alertness clue an assailant to bide his time
for easier prey, but one can signal subtle awareness and
preliminary preparedness. As some plain-clothes detectives
flap their coat at the first sign of danger to ensure
their weapon is clear for drawing, so the average citizen may
check his arsenal, real or implied. One cannot display any
armaments without jeopardy or brandish a weapon with impunity,
but direct and glaring eye-contact will warn away most people. An
intense stare of more than five-seconds duration is itself a
personal confrontation, and blindness is a real advantage in this
blink contest. One must not only use all knowledge and ability,
but must remain aware of any potential resources, including
exits. The objective is not random seek and destroy
predation, but rather arrive alive survival.
Techniques are typically subdivided into armed or
unarmed methods; both of which require extensive
practice to gain competence and proficiency. Armed techniques are
the conventional simple solution, and the litany of
legal and illegal, lethal and humane or safe,
manufactured and improvised weaponry is impressively vast. One's
attitude about limited risk is a major consideration in
using a weapon. Although the lore is replete with tales of
multiple-wound survival, and even persistent resistance, my
experience is that no wound or injury is so small or slight that
it will not kill or maim someone, instead of only hampering them.
Given recent judicial interpretations, a blind person employing a
firearm or knife or spray or stun-probe or bludgeon in a
self-defense plea has as much (or as little) chance of
successful exoneration as a sighted person. To prevent being
easily disarmed, and thus a victim of one's own weapon, a blind
person will have to modify the usual weapon out front
posture or weapon leading practice. Weapon ownership
poses two crucial problems: intent and
availability. In the opinion of the court, mere
possession of a self-defense weapon shows
hostile intent; and to carry it concealed without a
permit is a further violation. Anyone who displays his arsenal,
or uses it to threaten or intimidate another, is both a fool and
a coward; and deserves censure. A weapon should be unsuspected,
brandished ONLY after all else has
failed, and then, as a last resort, used precisely and expertly.
The problem with most weapons is that they are inconvenient, and
therefore unavailable when finally needed. Paranoids will cache
them everywhere, just in case, but the rest of us will just have
to improvise.
Improvisation is an art in itself, which some have made into a
lifestyle. Improvised self-defense can span the gamut from
carbonated drink sprays and prickly shrub bouquets to
rolled-magazine batons and jewelry fist ornaments. A
belt or credit card will buttress and intensify a strike; a shoe
or purse will reinforce a block and insulate a punch better than
an exposed hand, which is easily damaged. The long-cane, in its
various rigid and folded forms, is an excellent weapon[3] masquerading as a mobility
device. I know an athletic braille teacher who carries a
custom-made stainless-steel cane for its increased rigidity and
weight, and for its concomitant protection. Security stations
have lately begun inspecting my Hoover long-cane to ensure its
relative innocence, but it's still better protection
than the average traveler's camera or briefcase ... the Brits
don't carry those umbrellas just for unexpected rain! In its long
rigid form, it can slash, stab, beat, pry, brace, block, or trip
as directed. In close confrontation, the tip can impale a foot,
the butt can punch into the face or throat, and the handle can
act as a fist-load. It can imitate a fencing foil at
full-extension, or it can be choked-up to simulate an affixed-bayonet that pivots at each end. The folded cane resembles a
baton or linked rods, and can be manipulated similar to stick-fighting. The tension-cord within the folding cane can even serve
as a garrote, booby-trap, noose or loop, and secure tether. The
cane's advantages as a weapon are that it is almost
always available, and doesn't demonstrate hostile predisposition.
Even though a guide-dog will probably help to protect[4] its owner, its intelligent
disposition is far too valuable to risk in a security matter; so
one should avoid desensitizing the animal by either using the
folded cane attached to the dog's harness, or detach the harness-handle as a baton. Shouting the specious "Kill!"
command to your pacific guide-dog may do more than confuse the
poor beast, it will distract your foe and may even frighten him,
allowing you to begin your defense.
Unarmed fighting is among the most challenging and demanding
disciplines ever devised ... ask any competition wrestler. Most
combat schools have established routines, which make them
somewhat vulnerable to other systems ... hence the intramural
sport concept within each system where each only engages
with its own. Unfortunately, street combat doesn't abide by any
rules, and few people have the skill to master both a martial art
and confront every armed or unarmed contingency. Actually, very
few people will study martial arts more than casually, but most
of us can use a few of their techniques to restore dignity or
defend integrity. Learn the locations of nerve junctions to
halt or unhand any unwanted attention ...
steady nexus pressure or a sharp strike will numb muscular
response, interdict involuntary reflexes, and dissuade heedless
pursuit. Wrist-locks and arm-bars are also good low-intensity
persuaders without permanent damage. Without the ability
to aim a strike, a blind martial artist will have to adopt zone
or sweep movements preliminary to closer work. Try to avoid
inflicting more damage to self than the opponent by improper
strikes ... use the side-of-the-foot instead of the toes, the
heel-of-the-hand instead of the knuckles, the forearm or elbow
instead of the fist, and deliver them in combinations. Finger-locks leading to breakage, twists or bends leading to
dislocations, head-locks and strangle-holds leading to surrender
are equivalent to kicks and punches in escalating intensity; but
still not irreparable ... and still within magnanimous sane
reaction levels. Perspective is important in a calculating
society; so don't over-react with over-kill due to accumulated fear and unrequited frustration.
You should also realize that a cute little judo trick won't stop
an irresponsible drunk or irrational druggie ... many capricious
offenders will attempt to overwhelm or dominate moderate
resistance, and a situation can get very ugly very quickly when
the warning signals don't get through to the control center. The
laws of physics prevail regardless of trained determination, such
that a good large person will defeat a good small person every
time, and most confrontations end up on the ground as a muddled
grapple. The glad-hander who wants to push you in an unwanted
direction can be disengaged by shifting your attached arm
forward, reaching across your chest to nerve-pinch his now
exposed wrist[5] until he lets go
... at which time, depending on circumstances, you may release
him, or you may retain his wrist and elbow-strike backwards with
the newly freed arm, and then turn into him to teach him some
manners! Pinching the radial nerve even works with a prosthesis,
as a friend of mine, a blinded bilateral amputee from the war,
ably demonstrated in a bar when someone attempted to pick his
pocket ... the dip surely regretted his choice of mark, because
my friend had earlier cranked-up the tension on his
claws so he could crush those old fashioned steel beer
cans!
Some folks will say almost anything to a blind person, under the
supposition that if someone can't see what's obviously before
them, then they must be stupid ... which is
almost as common as the presumption that any blind or severely
handicapped person must also be deaf. It may be both impolitic
and antisocial for the blind man to take offense at their
ignorance, and either tweak his nose or ear, or depress his
trigeminal nerves; so he'll think next time before speaking. One
must always use judgement in calibrating[6] a response. As a strong and
confident blind traveler, I am constantly being man-handled by kind and concerned people who are trying to help
me in their fashion. But because every disabled person, at one
time or another, needs help of some kind from others, an abrupt
or intolerant reaction from me would be an inappropriate
repayment for their good samaritanism. We must always try not to
misjudge the innocent, and to be careful of the good ...
they are an endangered species.
This modest proposal is essentially theoretical
and conjectural. Skilled techniques require individual physical
instruction and personal practice to be effective. Ethical
scrutiny and mental discipline, like all character building,
requires introspection. The condition of legal liability exists
for anyone who disrupts the community or harms the citizenry.
Sanctions and privileges are always qualified or contingent. This
modest proposal suggests that civil liberties
grant us both the right of access and the right of exclusion, the
right to choose without penalty or compulsion, regardless of our
condition. Discretion may be the better part of valor, but for
some of us, blindness restricts our options and opportunities.
Anyone else can foresee an avoidable confrontation or run away
from a sudden fight, with only a minor loss of dignity; but I
usually won't discover the analogical ambush or metaphorical
minefield until I am already involved. Like the implacable
convictions of insensate bigots, stationary and inanimate objects
have tripped me up and put me down far too often for me to risk
blind flight away from an alleged harm or suspected
hazard. So, despite imprudent injury and forbidding forensics, I
immodestly propose to stand and fight, in
defense of my integrity and liberty, to the best of my ability.
It may not be pretty, but it is my ultimate choice.
[1]: approximately 60% of all
violent crimes are committed by about 10% of the general
population; while approximately 10% of all multiple or recidivist
crimes are committed by 60% of the known criminal population, and
the remaining 90% of multiple crimes represent personal antipathy
or private animus by 40% of the general population. Sexual
assaults are most often committed by someone known to the victim,
who planned the crime, which took place in the victim's home, is
often unreported, and when prosecuted, convicts only a small
fraction of perpetrators. False or hysterical crime reports are
statistically insignificant, being less than the sampling margin
of error. There are no reliable statistics specifically
identifying disabled or handicapped persons.
[return to text]
[2]: in a more recent case, a blind
man was acquitted on self-defense when he killed an assailant by
karate (meaning empty hands).
[return to text]
[3]: following employment as a
weapon, a cane will probably become useless as a post-encounter
mobility device, so remember that all
mobility aids are only adjuncts to or extensions of basic
methodologies ... one can still travel without cane or dog, even
in unfamiliar areas, using self-protective cross-body techniques
and careful foot placement. These methods are less efficient but
possible, so one never loses independence.
[return to text]
[4]: guide dogs that double as
personal protection is a popular misconception. Dog guide users
are discouraged from reinforcing any aggressive tendencies in
their animals. A dog guide must adapt to a wide variety of
socioeconomic settings, and so the training schools select
inherently gentle and stable animals from reliable breeds.
Nonetheless, the mere presence of a devoted dog acts as a
deterrent to molestation and violation.
[return to text]
[5]: originally conceived by blinded
veterans as a disengagement technique, the so-called Hines
Break (or break-away) is taught strictly for detachment; so
remember that with the rare exception of malice, most people are
trying to assist despite their ignorance of the best methods.
[return to text]
[6]: an incremental
response is calculated to counter with an appropriate and
equivalent level of force or violence, and should
not be confused with a graduated
response, which escalates the level of force or violence
necessary for protection along a developmental continuum. While
all confrontations are resolved by interpretive judgement,
leaving the intended victim liable to accusations of
over-reaction and prosecution, street
crime is not negotiated politics and personal
safety is not orchestrated warfare. In actual combat, there
isn't enough time to apply nice neat theoretical solutions.
Depending upon the situation, graduating the response from
verbal, to body posture, to defense, and finally to attack may
succeed; but if the assault is seriously intended, the
progression will immediately interrupt phasing to apply the
end-game conclusion. One cannot be caught in
transitional graduation when the opponent decides to conclude the
dispute or resolve the confrontation without suffering potential
harm. Remember, there are no rules and there is no umpire to
enforce civility during the execution of a criminal act; so make
any response the best response
of the moment. Don't think about it ... just focus and act!
[return to text]
by Paul Brubaker
... who is retired from the U.S. Army, has since been a
counselor, artisan, and writer, with numerous essays published in
chapbooks and magazines. In 1997, after peer review, an earlier
version of this article became the basis for the pamphlet Safe
without Sight, a crime-prevention guide published by National
Braille Press.
|