This short quiz is designed to test the general knowledge of the
average person exposed to books and movies featuring military
subjects. All of the terms are used in popular fiction. There are
no questions intended to trick or stump, and nobody can fail this
quiz.
The Mil-Speak quiz consists of thirty-three questions with
multiple choice answers. This format was deemed to be both the
fairest and most expedient. The test was designed to take
approximately ten to twelve minutes to complete, which brevity
would be attractive to invited participants. Asking for
definitions or completions ("fill in the blank")
would've alienated many testees. The "multiple guess"
format was also condusive to double-checking a testee's depth of
knowledge. The questions covered all branches of the military, so
anyone with actual military service would not necessarily be more
successful than an avid videophile or bibliophile. The
"all of the above" and "none of the
above" selections had to be included on every item to
prevent the obvious answer when included on only the appropriate
queries.
Q#01: A fugleman is?
_ ... (model soldier, paradigm, archetype)
- boomer
X ... (skilled person on fast-track; related to USN submarine /
USAF jet)
- dead-soldier
_ ... (empty booze bottle)
- leg
_ ... (non-paratrooper or basic grunt; not an over-achiever)
- boot
_ ... (trainee)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The first question: A fugleman is?
required knowledge of the formal word for a model
soldier, paradigm, or archetype in order
to match the slang term. It has been said that military personnel
are the most contradictory group of persons ever assembled; since
they have great knowledge of math and science, know several
foreign languages, are ethical and healthy, but swear heavily and
fluently, and employ their remarkable skills in destructive and
devastating ways. The average military person will comfortably
mix five-cent and five-dollar words in the same sentence, and
other military personnel will understand all of
it! The correct answer is boomer,
referring to any skilled person on a fast-track; but also related
to USN nuclear submarine and USAF jet airplane. A
dead-soldier is an empty booze bottle. A
leg is a non-paratrooper or basic grunt; someone
who is not an over-achiever. A boot is a
trainee, or someone unskilled.
Q#02: An incompetent or shirker is?
- feather merchant
_ ... (trying to sell the idea that a bag of feathers is heavier
than a bag of rocks)
- goldbrick
_ ... (an inert burden to others, as if valuable)
- yardbird
_ ... (trooper who is marginally functional or a petty criminal,
or both)
- tap-dancer
_ ... (watch the fancy footwork, so you won't see what is or is
not being done with the hands)
- all of the above
X ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The correct answer to question two: An
incompetent or shirker is? is
all of the above. A feather
merchant is someone selling the idea that a bag of
feathers is heavier than a bag of rocks. A
goldbrick is someone who's an inert burden to
others, as if extremely valuable. A yardbird is
a trooper who is marginally functional, or a petty criminal, or
both. A tap-dancer is someone who thinks their
fancy footwork distracts from what the hands are or are not
doing.
Q#03: An eager and enthusiastic workaholic is?
_ ... (dedicated or compulsive worker)
- boy wonder
_ ... (talent promoted beyond experience)
- hot dog
_ ... (talented show-off who lacks good judgement)
- sweat hog
X ... (someone who loves to work)
- cowboy
_ ... (talented show-off who is too independent to cooperate)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question three asks: An eager and enthusiastic
workaholic is?, which requires a substitution
for a dedicated or compulsive worker. The correct answer
is sweat hog, which is someone who loves to
work. A boy wonder is a talented person promoted
beyond their experience. A hot dog is a talented
show-off who lacks good judgement. A cowboy is a
talented show-off who is too independent to cooperate. During the
Vietnam War, an indigenous caoboy was a
hybrid compounded from Vietnamese cao for "bad" and
English boy for "immature" (not a man); a "bad boy".
Q#04: Which of the following does not
mean messed-up or confused?
- S N A F U
_ ... (Situation Normal - All Fucked Up)
- F O U O
X ... (For Official Use Only)
- F U B A R
_ ... (Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition)
- T A R F U
_ ... (Things Are Really Fucked Up)
- F U B B
_ ... (Fucked Up Beyond Belief)
- none of the above
_ ...
The fourth question asks: Which of the following does
not mean messed-up or
confused?, and the correct answer is F
O U O, which abbreviates For Official Use Only.
S N A F U means Situation Normal - All Fucked
Up. F U B A R means Fucked Up Beyond All
Recognition. T A R F U means Things Are Really
Fucked Up. F U B B means Fucked Up Beyond
Belief.
Q#05: Altering a message or its signal to prevent interception
is?
- K A K
_ ... (encryption / decryption by device)
- shackle
_ ... (encoding / decoding by pattern)
- alphabet soup
_ ... (nonsense resulting from code jumble)
- scramble
_ ... (changing frequencies and speed of traffic)
- all of the above
X ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The correct answer to question 5: Altering a message or
its signal to prevent interception is? is all of
the above. To K A K is encryption /
decryption by mechanical device. To shackle is
encoding / decoding by pattern. Alphabet soup is
the nonsense resulting from code jumble. To
scramble is changing frequencies and speed of
traffic, including burst (condensed)
transmissions.
Q#06: A person operating a howitzer is?
_ ... (short-barreled portable cannon or artillery)
- F A G
_ ... (slang for Field Artillery Guy)
- redleg
_ ... (artilleryman, from original color of trousers, then color
of stripe)
- cannon-cocker
_ ... (slang for artilleryman)
- bullet-head
_ ... (slang for artilleryman)
- all of the above
X ...
- none of the above
_ ...
To answer question six: A person operating a
howitzer is?, the testee must have basic
knowledge about short-barreled portable cannon or
artillery, so as to correctly answer all of the
above. A F A G is a slang acronym for
Field Artillery Guy. A redleg is an
artilleryman, as derived from the original color of trousers, and
later from the color of trouser stripe. A
cannon-cocker is slang for an artilleryman. A
bullet-head is slang for an artilleryman.
Q#07: A crunchy is?
- infantryman
X ... (also dogface, grunt, snuffy, ground-pounder, etc)
- signalman
_ ... (called "sparks")
- tanker
_ ... (sometimes "tanker-clanker")
- burn casualty
_ ... (called "crispy critter")
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question seven asks: A crunchy is?, and
this could easily be confused with words of similar meaning. The
correct answer is infantryman (literally
"infant + man", due to the fact that young men
are the only ones strong enough to accomplish the task) from the
sound of marching feet. Infantrymen have many other appellations,
including dogface, grunt, snuffy,
ground-pounder, and others. A signalman
is called "sparks". A tanker is
sometimes called "tanker-clanker". A burn
casualty is called a "crispy critter".
Q#08: A jarhead is?
- Marine Corpsman
_ ... (by extension from hat and stubborn/stupid)
- Marine's utility cover
_ ... (by extension from sailor's hat, as top or cap on jar)
- sailor's hat
_ ... (from resemblance of "Dixie Cup" cap to top or cover on
jar)
- mule
_ ... (original meaning of stubborn or stupid as a mule)
- all of the above
X ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question eight is: A jarhead is? a
depth of knowledge item, with the correct answer being
all of the above. The obvious answer is the
person with whom the object is associated, but that object has
changed over time, and so has the metonymic personage. A
Marine or Marine Corpsman is as
stubborn (determined) and as stupid (intrepid) as a mule, and
also wears the distinctive USMC utility cover (hat). A
Marine's utility cover is unique headgear, by
extension and transference from a sailor's hat, and tops a Marine
the way a lid caps a jar. A sailor's hat, by
resemblance to a "Dixie Cup", is unique headgear, that
tops a sailor the way a lid caps a jar. A recalcitrant
mule, also called a "jughead", for its
persistent obliquity, extends and transfers characteristics to
relentless muleteers, drovers, and cavalrymen [because mules have
more endurance than horses, cavalry units used them in the
midwest and southwest throughout the Indian Wars, before and
after the Civil War; another term, shavetail, is
directly related to the management of military mules].
Q#09: Air Force gloves are?
_ ... (from the casual or informal manner of air crews; would
never be "Marine gloves")
- remote high-tech manipulators
_ ... (as with hazardous materials)
- enlarged luminous paddles for signaling
_ ... (called wand or paddle)
- high-performance protective hand-covering
_ ... (aviator's gloves are fireproof)
- hands in pockets of uniform
X ... (other branches sew pockets closed for a better appearance)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question nine asks: Air Force gloves
are?, and the correct answer is based upon military
lifestyles. The Air Force is the most informal of the military
branches, based upon their highly technical duties and extremely
skilled personnel, none of whom will tolerate "mickey
mouse" when comfortable civilian jobs await them. In order
to retain these people and their skills, the Air Force is lavish
with rank and privileges (eg: a $12-million tank is commanded by
an Army sergeant but a $12-million airplane is commanded by an
Air Force officer). Air Force insignia, commonly called
"brass", is actually made of anodized aluminum and
cannot be polished! The Air Force routinely runs
three shifts of workers to give full service and 24-hour
coverage. The Army and Navy only do this under special
circumstances and in selected units. The correct answer is
hands in pockets of uniform, because it would
only happen in the Air Force. Other branches of the military
actually sew their pockets closed for a better appearance. The
other ansers are only plausible. Remote high-tech
manipulators, as with hazardous materials, imply
technical usage. Enlarged luminous paddles for
signaling are actually called "wands" or
"paddles". High-performance protective
hand-covering do really exist; aviator's gloves are
fireproof.
Q#10: A bird is?
- airplane
_ ...
- missile
_ ...
- satellite
_ ...
- helicopter
_ ...
- all of the above
X ... (anything that flies through the air)
- none of the above
_ ...
The correct answer to question ten: A bird
is? is all of the above, based upon the
metaphoric extension to anything that flies through the air. The
airplane, missile,
satellite, and helicopter are
included; but falling objects, like mortar rounds and airdropped
bombs are excluded.
Q#11: An aviator is?
_ ... ("pilot" can be navigator, steersman, or chaplain)
- F U F
_ ... (slang for Fella Up Front; not copilot, navigator, or
weapons officer)
- airdale
_ ... (slang for USN aviator)
- rotorhead
_ ... (slang for helicopter pilot)
- fighter jock
_ ... (slang for jet pilot)
- all of the above
X ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The correct answer to question eleven: An
aviator is? is all of the
above. A "pilot" can be a navigator, steersman,
or chaplain ("sky pilot"). A F U F is
slang for Fella Up Front; someone who is not the copilot,
navigator, or weapons officer. An airdale is
slang for a USN aviator. A rotorhead is slang
for a helicopter pilot. A fighter jock is slang
for a jet pilot.
Q#12: When the enemy is sighted, a pilot calls?
- tally-ho
_ ... (authorization to chase and attack a confirmed target)
- bogie
_ ... (designates any unidentified potential target; must confirm
friend or foe)
- ahoy
_ ... (hail to ship)
- bandit
X ... (designates a confirmed enemy target)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question twelve: When the enemy is sighted, a pilot
calls? is a depth of knowledge item. The correct answer
is bandit, based upon identification of a
confirmed enemy target. A tally-ho is
authorization to pursue and attack a confirmed target; as such,
would be subsequent to the bandit call. In Naval
aviation, if the target is confirmed, the call skips the
preliminary bandit, and issues a
tally-ho immediately. A bogie
is any unidentified potential target; all unknown objects must be
confirmed as friend or foe. Ahoy is the
universal hail to ships.
Q#13: Bragging rights for a job well done is?
_ ... (the right to proclaim based on achievement)
- bayonet sheet
_ ... (negative evaluation)
- bravo sierra
_ ... (phonetic for B S or bullshit [well done = bravo zulu])
- Maggie's drawers
_ ... (zero, total miss, complete failure)
- blowing smoke
_ ... (obscuring or concealing the truth [bad news])
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
X ...
The correct answer to question thirteen: Bragging
rights for a job well done is?, based upon
proclamations derived from achievement, is none of the
above. A bayonet sheet is a negative
evaluation. Bravo sierra is phonetic for B S or
bullshit. Maggie's drawers are a zero rating,
total miss, or complete failure; with the sexual connotation of
"no score" by missing "the target".
Blowing smoke is obscuring the truth or
concealing "bad news".
Q#14: The awards and decorations worn on a
uniform are?
_ ... (as rewarded, decorated; not ornamented)
- trash
_ ... (slang for qualification badge)
- gong
_ ... (slang for pendent medal)
- fruit salad
_ ... (slang for the colorful ribbon-bars representing pendent
medals)
- scrambled eggs
_ ... (decorations commensurate with higher rank)
- all of the above
X ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The correct answer to question fourteen: The
awards and decorations worn on a uniform
are?, based upon the distinction between
decorated or rewarded for conduct rather than
ornamented for appearance, is all of the
above. Trash is slang for qualification
badges; so called due to the requirement for obtaining them in
order to serve in particular units, hence meaningless as a
prerequisite, and totally inappropriate for any other unit where
the skills are not utilized. Gong is slang for
any pendent medal, attributed to the clamorous sound they make
when hanging and banging on everybody's chest. Fruit
salad is slang for the colorful ribbon-bars representing
pendent medals, most of which are awarded for just showing-up at
the right place at the right time. Scrambled
eggs are decorations commensurate with higher rank,
since elevated status always needs fancy styling. All of these
terms deride the distinctions, but no one doubts the need for
respect. This is the same reverse psychology that
promulgates "gallows humor". To counterbalance the
military tendency to adorn themselves in a mode that would shame
a peacock, a Murphy Law of Combat proclaims: "The
side with the simplest uniform always wins the war!"
Q#15: Three sequential victories are?
- triplet
_ ... (any set of three; not military)
- daisy-chain
_ ... (slang for sequence of explosives)
- hat trick
X ... (originally sports metaphor, adopted by aviators)
- triple bogy
_ ... (sports metaphor; not military)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question fifteen asks: Three sequential victories
are? The correct answer is hat trick,
which was originally a sports metaphor that was adopted by
aviators during allied operations in World war Two. A
triplet is any set of three; which is not a
military term. A daisy-chain is slang for a
sequence or series of explosives; and, together with hat
trick, has sexual connotations. A triple
bogy is a sports metaphor; which is not a military term.
Q#16: A garden of stones is?
_ ... (from the manicured setting for gravestones)
- munitions dump
_ ... (called dump or depot)
- cemetery
X ... (because war only leaves memorials [cf: origin of trophy])
- arrangement of bunkers and fortifications
_ ... (called Military Line of Resistance / MLR)
- storage depot for contaminants and toxins
_ ... (called "field of tombs")
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question sixteen asks: A garden of stones
is?, which refers to the manicured setting for
gravestones. Questions 16 and 17 offer the same answers, so they
are testing depth of knowledge. The correct answer is
cemetery, because war only leaves memorials as
mute testimony[cf: origin of trophy]. A
munitions dump is called dump or
depot. An arrangement of bunkers and
fortifications is called the Military Line of
Resistance [MLR]. A storage depot for contaminants
and toxins is called a "field of tombs".
Q#17: A field of tombs is?
_ ... (from their resemblance to mausoleums arranged in a field)
- munitions dump
_ ... (called dump or depot)
- cemetery
_ ... (called "garden of stones")
- arrangement of bunkers
_ ... (called Military Line of Resistance / MLR)
- storage depot for contaminants and toxins
X ... (because, if ever leaked or released, everybody's dead)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question seventeen asks: A field of tombs
is?, which refers to their resemblance to mausoleums
arranged in a field. Questions 16 and 17 offer the same answers,
so they are testing depth of knowledge. The correct answer is
storage depot for contaminants and toxins,
because if it is ever released, everybody's dead; thus proving
that nobody ever wins from war. A munitions
dump is called dump or depot. A
cemetery is called a "garden of
stones", from the manicured setting for gravestones. An
arrangement of bunkers and fortifications is
called the Military Line of Resistance [MLR].
Q#18: A retreat or retrograde movement is?
- hotel alfa
_ ... (phonetic for Haul Ass; withdraw)
- beat-feet
_ ... (slang for withdraw)
- changing tune
_ ... (refers to switch in bugle-call from "charge" to "retreat")
- bug-out
_ ... (slang for withdraw)
- all of the above
X ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The correct answer to question eighteen: A
retreat or retrograde movement is? is
all of the above. Hotel alfa is
phonetic for the "HA" in Haul Ass; meaning to withdraw.
Beat-feet is slang for withdraw.
Changing tune refers to the switch in
bugle-calls from "charge" to "retreat". Bug-out
is
slang for withdraw.
Q#19: Someone who has crossed the equator on-board ship is?
- dolphin
_ ... (slang for submariner)
- shellback
X ... (slang for veteran sailor; sea creature)
- pollywog
_ ... (slang for novice sailor who must undergo a "sea change";
amphibian)
- mossback
_ ... (slang for wise veteran sailor, "old salt"; old fish or
turtle)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question nineteen asks: Someone who has crossed the
equator on-board ship is?. The correct answer is
shellback, which, as a sea creature, is slang
for a veteran sailor. In testing depth of knowledge, a
mossback, which is an old fish or turtle, is
reserved for wise "old salt" sailors who have great
experience. Another depth of knowledge answer is a
pollywog, which, as an amphibian, actually
refers to novice sailors about to undergo a "sea change"
to shellback when crossing the equator. A
dolphin is slang for a submariner.
Q#20: The butcher's bill is?
- commissary expense
_ ... (food issued; not billed)
- casualty report
X ... (from the carnage of battle)
- messhall account
_ ... (no bills or accounts maintained)
- quartermaster receipt
_ ... (clothing issued; not billed)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question twenty asks: The butcher's bill
is? The correct answer is casualty
report, from the carnage of battle. Commissary
expense is incorrect because food is issued, not billed.
Messhall account is incorrect because no bills
or accounts are maintained. Quartermaster
receipt is incorrect because clothing is issued, not
billed.
Q#21: A chop shop is?
_ ... (rhyming slang)
- galley / messhall
_ ... (implies ruined or destroyed food)
- motor-pool
_ ... (implies customization work on vehicles)
- surgery
X ... (by appearance and analogy to a butcher's shop)
- personnel / admin
_ ... (implies mishandling of records and reports)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question twenty-one asks: A chop shop
is? The correct answer for this rhyming slang is
surgery, by analogy and resemblance to a
butcher's shop. The galley / messhall answer
implies ruined or destroyed food. The motor-pool
answer implies customization work on vehicles. The
personnel / admin answer implies mishandling of
records and reports.
Q#22: A dogsbody is?
- aide
_ ... (military assistant or gofer)
- cadet
_ ... (officer trainee)
- factotum
_ ... (military assistant or gofer)
- surrogate
_ ... (military deputy or substitute)
- all of the above
X ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The correct answer to question twenty-two: A
dogsbody is? is all of the
above. An aide is a military assistant
or gofer. A cadet is an officer trainee. A
factotum is a military assistant or gofer. A
surrogate is a military deputy or substitute.
Q#23: A blanket party is?
_ ... (slang for corporal punishment of individual for
infractions affecting group)
- fragging
_ ... (slang for killing the leader; opposite of "blanket party")
- drumhead
X ... (summary justice, expedient remedy; punishment imposed
without trial)
- bivouac
_ ... (military encampment; implies "picnic")
- F T X
_ ... (abbreviation for Field Training eXercise; implies
"picnic")
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The depth of knowledge necessary to interpret question
twenty-three: A blanket party is?
anticipates a comprehension of corporal punishment of an
individual for infractions that affect the entire group. The
correct answer is drumhead, which is summary
justice; it's an expedient remedy or punishment imposed without
trial. A fragging, which is slang for killing
the unit leader, is the opposite of a blanket
party [nb: a blanket party increases
conformity and cohesion, but a fragging
increases irresponsibility and insubordination]. Both
bivouac, which is a military encampment, and
F T X, which is the abbreviation for Field
Training eXercise, imply a civilian-style "picnic".
Q#24: Rocks 'n' Shoals is?
_ ... (slang for "go cautiously", from shallows and hazards)
- U C M J
X ... (abbreviation for Uniform Code of Military Justice)
- Captain's Mast
_ ... (the hearing where sailors receive non-judicial
punishment)
- keelhaul
_ ... (euphemism for "deep trouble", from former punishment)
- J A G
_ ... (abbreviation for Judge Advocate General; a military
lawyer)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question twenty-four asks: Rocks 'n' Shoals
is?, which slang anticipates an extension from shallows
and hazards to "go cautiously". The correct answer is
U C M J, being the abbreviation for Uniform Code
of Military Justice, which is the codex of military laws. A
Captain's Mast is the hearing where sailors
receive non-judicial punishment; that is, where Rocks 'n'
Shoals are applied. Keelhaul, based
upon an old form of deadly punishment, is a euphemism for "deep
trouble". J A G, being the abbreviation for
Judge Advocate General, is a military counsel or lawyer who
functions as a "guide" or "pilot" through the Rocks 'n'
Shoals.
Q#25: An easy or low-risk mission is?
- cakewalk
_ ... (routine mission, uneventful accomplishment; "no sweat")
- duck soup
_ ... (routine mission, uneventful accomplishment; "no sweat")
- laugh a minute
_ ... (routine mission, uneventful accomplishment, especially
small boat operations)
- walk in the park
_ ... (routine mission, uneventful accomplishment, especially air
operations)
- all of the above
X ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The correct answer to question twenty-five: An
easy or low-risk mission is? is
all of the above. A cakewalk is
a routine mission or uneventful accomplishment; meaning "no
sweat". Duck soup is a routine mission or
uneventful accomplishment; meaning "no sweat". A
laugh a minute is a routine mission or
uneventful accomplishment, especially on small boat operations. A
walk in the park is a routine mission or
uneventful accomplishment, especially on air operations.
Q#26: A paid vacation, including transportation, is?
- leave
_ ... (accountable to accrued earnings, but at personal expense)
- pass / liberty
_ ... (not accountable, but at personal expense)
- A W O L
_ ... (abbreviation for Absent WithOut Leave; a crime)
- R & R
X ... ("Rest and Recreation" or "Rest and Recuperation" with all
expenses paid)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The crucial part of question twenty-six: A paid vacation,
including transportation, is? is the depth of knowledge
regarding who pays for what. Not only does the military grant
thirty-days of paid vacation each year (which can only be
accumulated to a maximum of three years before loss), but
emergency or convalescent leave, and travel to
new or temporary assignments is also warranted. Further,
satisfactory and superior performance is rewarded by a 4 - 72
hour pass or liberty at the
individual's own expense. During extreme conditions, such as
wartime, dedicated service and outstanding performance is
rewarded by Rest and Recuperation (R&R), which
is entirely paid by the military. In exchange for all of these
wonderful benefits, the military requires that people be
available to work 24-hours a day and obey all lawful orders
without exception or excuse ... in other words, the military
works hard and it also plays hard! The correct answer is
R & R, which has variously meant "Rest and
Refitment" (American Civil War), "Rest and
Recuperation" (WW2 - VN War), and "Rest and
Recreation" ... an abbreviation which has been adopted by
many civilians. Leave, whether accrued or
unaccounted, is only restricted by time, but paid by the
individual. Pass or Liberty is
restricted by both time and distance, and is paid by the
individual. A W O L, the abbreviation for Absent
WithOut Leave [meaning "permission", and distinguished from an
Unauthorized Absence (UA)], is illegal, and is performed
entirely at the individual's risk and expense.
Q#27: The housewife is?
- charge of quarters
_ ... (temporary duty, abbreviated CQ)
- locker for cleaning supplies
_ ... (closet, bin, or stowage)
- sewing kit
X ... (due to lack of spouse or seamstress to do needed sewing)
- chief cook
_ ... (called mess sergeant, steward, or "cookie")
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question twenty-seven asks: The housewife
is? The correct answer is a sewing kit,
which is so called due to the lack of a spouse or seamstress to
do needed sewing. The other possible answers play on the domestic
potential of this phrase. The charge of quarters
(CQ) is a temporary duty assignment for lower ranking sergeants.
The locker for cleaning supplies is simply a
closet, bin, or stowage. The chief cook, who
would never tolerate the slur implicit in such an appellation, is
properly called a mess sergeant, steward, or "cookie".
Q#28: A blooper is?
- mistake
_ ... (botch; not military)
- chronic mistake-maker
_ ... (bumbler; not military)
- mortar
_ ... (compact, portable, indirect-fire weapons; also called
"mortie" or "piss tube")
- grenade launcher
X ... (from the sound made during launch; also called "thumper")
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question twenty-eight asks: A blooper
is? The correct answer is a grenade
launcher, from the sound made during firing, being
either an M-79 or M-203, which is also called a
"thumper" or "thump-gun". By association, a
mortar, which is sometimes called
"mortie" or "piss tube", are compact and
portable indirect-fire weapons. Both of the other answers (ie:
mistake for botch, and chronic
mistake-maker for bumbler) are non-military, and are
suitable only to civilian experience ... the military has a
plethora of epithets for people who cannot do things right.
Q#29: The command headquarters is?
- fudge factory
_ ... (from fudging numbers and reports)
- mad house
_ ... (from the disorder during operations)
- puzzle palace
_ ... (from the elaborate and unworkable plans generated)
- fort fumble
_ ... (from an inability to "carry-on" when field troops
hand-over a prize)
- all of the above
X ...
- none of the above
_ ...
The correct answer to question twenty-nine: The command
headquarters is? is all of the
above. A fudge factory is so called
from fudging numbers and reports. A mad house is
so called from the disorder during operations. A puzzle
palace is so called from the elaborate and unworkable
plans generated. Fort fumble is so called from
an inability to "carry-on" when field troops hand-over a
prize.
Q#30: A rack is?
- bomb load
_ ... (where munitions are hung or mounted; not the payload
[called "stick"])
- torturous situation
_ ... (from an ancient torture device; not military)
- tiered bed
X ... (stacked bunks, as on troop transports; go to bed = "hit
the rack")
- tray / shelf
_ ... (origin for tier of beds; not military)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question thirty asks: A rack is? The
correct answer is a tiered bed or stacked bunks,
as in billets and on troop transports; therefore, "go to bed" is
expressed as "hit the rack". A
tray / shelf is probably the origin for a tier
of beds, but the imitation is not specifically military. A
bomb load is the munition "package" or
payload, which does not include the housing where the munitions
are hung or mounted. A torturous situation is
related to an ancient torture device; therefore not a valid
military usage.
Q#31: Being sheep-dipped is?
_ ... (from changing the outward appearance)
- detached to other government agency
X ... (to expand experience, develop skill, extend liaison)
- deactivation / demobilization
_ ... (discharge, force reduction, retirement)
- temporary duty
_ ... (other military assignment; no subterfuge)
- permanent reassignment
_ ... (other military assignment; no subterfuge)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question thirty-one asks: Being sheep-dipped
is?, which is based upon the outward change of
appearance when a wolf is dressed in sheep's clothing.
The correct answer is detached to other government
agency, so as to expand experience, develop skill, and
extend liaison. Deactivation / demobilization,
such as discharge, force reduction, or retirement, does not
involve subterfuge. Temporary duty, such as some
other military assignment, does not involve subterfuge.
Permanent reassignment, such as some other
military assignment, does not involve subterfuge.
Q#32: Which of the following is bulletproof?
- steel helmet
_ ... (deflects shrapnel)
- cover
_ ... (protective position; not immune)
- concealment
_ ... (not visible, but can still be hit)
- flak vest
_ ... (deflects shrapnel)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
X ... (anything truly "bulletproof" limits military options)
The correct answer to question thirty-two: Which of the
following is bulletproof? is none of
the above. Of all these questions, the answer to this
one flouts doctrine and conventional wisdom with the reality of
combat: there is no safe place on the
battlefield! The official definition of
cover is anything that obstructs direct fire;
but that assumes a static situation, no maneuver, and only one
form of assault, which are rare events in the real world of
warfare. In fact, one of the Murphy Laws of Combat says
that "If your attack or defense is going really well, then
you're missing something!" Concealment
means "not visible", which is why the military invented the
wasteful doctrine of "recon by fire", because targets
that can't be seen can still be hit. The steel
helmet has always been a compromise that can cause as
many problems as it prevents ... grunts know to unbuckle
their chin-straps or concussion may break their necks! The
old-style "steel pot" was at least multipurpose, since
troops could wash in them, dig with them, sit on them, and hide
under them; but the new-style high-tech "K-domes" are
too fragile for any of those things. The flak
vest or flak jacket was never designed
to stop bullets (ie: flak means shrapnel); and the version that
incorporated ceramic plates, called a "chicken plate",
for helicopter crewmembers were too bulky and heavy to be used in
the field by regular troops.
Q#33: The correct way to sign-off or disconnect
is?
- over and out
_ ... (egregious error; "over" = your turn to talk, "out"
= I'm finished talking)
- out
X ... (short for "[I'm] out of the net";
protocol extends privilege of discontinuing to superior)
- carry-on
_ ... (command for you to continue, resume, or execute)
- dismissed
_ ... (command for you to depart or break formation)
- all of the above
_ ...
- none of the above
_ ...
Question thirty-three asks: The correct way to
sign-off or disconnect is? The correct
answer is simply out, which is short for
"[I'm] OUT of the net". Military protocol
extends the privilege of discontinuing to the superior, but the
urgency of a situation takes precedence [eg: a lieutenant is
legally entitled to direct a colonel to vacate a platoon net, but
if the colonel is stupid enough to intrude during a crisis, then
he's probably vindictive enough to follow-up later]. Made popular
by numerous films and books, over and out is an
egregious error; "over" means your turn
to talk (continue), and "out" means
I'm finished talking (discontinue) ... it can be
one or the other, but not both. Carry-on
is the command for you to continue, resume, or execute.
Dismissed is the command for you to
depart or break formation. The issue with both
carry-on and dismissed is who's
talking ... one cannot give one's self an order, so someone else
must command continuation or dismissal; similar to the "thank
you" and "you're welcome" dichotomy. Since
over is not conclusive, and over and
out is mutually contradictory, the only acceptable
sign-off is out.
The foregoing quiz was sample tested across a wide demographic
spectrum in satisfaction of a graduate language theory course,
and a statistical analysis generated the following conclusions.
The results of this survey were dismal (in the sense of
forbiddingly inept); but even wretched results are valid, and can
offer worthwhile conclusions. Some military branch (US Army, US
Navy, US Air Force, US Marine Corps, etc) specific questions
attempted to ascertain a greater public awareness of one
or another service, with eclectic results. Of the total number of
possible answers, only 19% were right. The
most frequent correct answer was R&R, while the
most frequently wrong answers were over-and-out
and jarhead.
The demographic indicators do not warrant
the results. Although there were more women in the sample, and
they ostensibly have less interest in military subjects, the
military connection was extremely high for both sexes.
Furthermore, the sample population was well distributed in the
age categories, each of which represents a conflict era (ie: WW2
- Vietnam, Grenada - Persian Gulf, Somalia - Afghanistan). The
results are generally impartial with respect to branch of
service, and a military connection was not advantageous. The
dismal results are therefore indicative of conclusions that
transcend simple demographic categories. These results seemingly
indicate either linguistic disparities or test deficiencies, or
both, as explicated in the following conclusion.
With a few notable exceptions among the participants who had
actually served or were still serving in the military, most
testees issued a verbal disclaimer immediately upon acceptance of
the quiz: I probably won't do well. Each of these
persons was reassured that they could not fail, and they should
just do the best they could. When returning the completed tests,
a couple of personal acquaintances stated, despite all previous
assurances: I probably failed, which is what you probably
expected. Most participants volunteered that the test
was hard or that the test was harder than I thought it
would be. This was the first significant
conclusion, because the quiz was designed to be
simple and easy. The author, in retrospect,
probably should've established a baseline of extremely obvious
questions (using terms like dogface, swabbie,
STRAC, shipshape, pup tent, etc); but
this hindsight argument can be further discriminated, and the
test might have gotten too long with a baseline added. Consider
whether STRAC is more or less common than either
R&R or AWOL. Consider that the simple word
hooch has two denotative senses (thatched hut, Tlingit
booze) and one connotative sense (sex, as in shack-job),
so selecting simple words is not simple!
Suffice it to say that the quiz was not designed for anyone to
fail. The author is well aware that tests can be written so that
even knowledgeable persons will fail. The terms selected, as
indicated in the preface to the quiz, are all in common use in
current popular media. With that acknowledgment, the difficulty
of the quiz is probably due to two other factors:
context and association.
Words, or meaning modules, are essentially arbitrary;
and slang, together with other colloquialisms and jargon, is more
arbitrary than hieratic or other formal conventions. The meaning
of many unfamiliar words can be inferred from conveyed
associations, from attached non-verbal labels, from
correlative facial or body language. Before the UCMJ was
instituted in 1951, the Articles of War included a prohibition
against silent insolence, which recognized that an
insult did not need to be verbalized to be conveyed. While it is
true that association can hint at a word's
meaning, one of the problems with slang and jargon is that their
specialization may and often does mislead inferential
definitions. Some words, such as rack and
blooper, have both a civilian and military meaning; and
the military application can be so precise (eg: rack or
gun) that misuse outside the small
coterie of specialists is commonplace (nb: just
as the number of actual combatants is small, so the number of
servicemembers who actually work in any specialty is small). The
majority of people, military and civilian, derive their
comprehension of slang or jargon by context ...
an arcane term uttered in relation to other words and specific
procedures. This contextualization is formally known as being
field dependent. When a medic and a cook discuss
communications, they will be less knowledgeable than an
infantryman and artilleryman discussing the same subject, and all
will be ignorant compared to signalmen. Likewise, when a movie
shows certain behavior and the dialogue includes specialized
terms, the audience may associate the words with the objects or
acts, whether they're related or not.
When slang or jargon appears out of context or
without associative cues, there is a probability
that it will be misunderstood. If one's passive vocabulary is
dependent upon cognitive maps, then placing the subject in a
frame will provide a link only if the term has
contextual or associative
relevance. It is not possible to deduce an unknown without either
actual experience or meaningful association. The utility of
inventions lies in their specificity. Lacking same, the
terminology is as alien as a foreign language. Therefore, the
second major conclusion from this survey is that
the test actually measured active vocabulary instead of
a general or passive vocabulary by virtue of
presenting words without enough context or
association to permit inferences. Among the
general public, which is the target audience, the
popular words and expressions were excerpted from their original
format, so they lost connectivity and continuity. If the
specialized terms had been situated thematically, as they appear
in books and films, it is probable that more people would've
recognized them, and identified their relational meanings. This
conjecture is speculative, but in the several instances when
participants wanted to know the right answers, the
explanation reminded them of episodes and scenes that typified
the usage. In other words, they knew more than the test revealed.
The third major conclusion from this survey is
that, in particular scenarios, incomprehensible verbiage
lends verisimilitude. Given the regular exploitation of
specialized fields for their entertainment value, language is
secondary to the action or drama being portrayed ... in essence,
the slang and jargon employed for these productions is merely
aural wallpaper! The average person does not
know the actual meaning of writ, bolus, or
sponson, but it sounds appropriately technical for the
situation being dramatized. Because craftsmanship is important to
their developmental legacy, scriptwriters and other authors will
trouble to research their subject, such that a book or drama set
in the field of law, medicine, sports, police, or the military
will be reasonably accurate. Such accuracy does not
necessarily translate into painless public education,
but it substantiates the subject or setting with audience members
who have some level of familiarity or expertise in that field. In
fact, field specific series and films have generated audience
participation games where medicos diagnose illnesses before
the script reveals the answer, or military personnel itemize all
the tactical and procedural errors in the fictitious war story. A
contrapositive of this phenomenon is that the general public
expects actual courtroom trials to resemble media portrayals; and
a contrary result is that specialists try to invest more drama
and fantasy into their actual routine jobs. At first, art
imitates life, then life imitates art. For the
Monday morning quarterback or armchair
adventurer, this can be a fascinating excursion into a world
they can never hope to inhabit. These buffs will adopt the
vocabulary and become as expert as a legitimate
participant. For the most part, this avocational indulgence is
harmless; but the wannabe cult of phony or illicit
players often casts aspersions upon the genuine parties, who are
otherwise blameless. One of the reasons why jargon develops is to
quickly and reliably identify associates, but with the
proliferation of jargon through entertainment, both credibility
and vocabulary are subject to increased scrutiny.
A fourth conclusion is minor,
having to do with procedure. When informed that this
terminological quiz was a fun test, a couple of
participants retorted that no test is fun and all
tests are like all other tests in school. With this
supposition, it was obvious that few of the participants used the
test-taking rationale that they probably
would've used for a difficult test in school. Since many
concluded the test was harder than I thought it would
be, a strategy to gamble the odds would probably
have produced more correct answers than a strict dependence upon
knowledge. In a multiple guess strategy, a deduction for
all would've been warranted anytime more than
one possible answer (eg: bug-out, beat-feet)
appeared. The testee would not need to know the other terms (ie:
changing tune, hotel alfa), since any two
possibilities would automatically become a grouping. Likewise,
whenever one obviously different answer appeared (eg:
AWOL, FOUO), both the all and
none responses could be eliminated. This is the
same deductive process used in other tests, but the evidence
shows that it was not employed in this quiz. Further, if one
simply played the mathematical probabilities, several of the
tests would've had higher scores without ever reading the
questions or answer options. The counter to this supposition is
that the test was, in fact, so very
difficult that no strategic rationale was possible.
Unfortunately, the author must concede such a counter claim, and
abjectly apologize (mea culpa) for tormenting so many
kind and decent people.
|